Why did God allow Angels or Demons to have relationships with Human Females and produce offspring?

How is it possible for Angels and Demons to have sex with humans?

Why would God allow that if he had a problem with it and even let them produce offspring, why do Angels even have “Free Will”?

Doesn’t some of this silly stuff make you wonder if the Stories in the Bible are myths?

15 thoughts on “Why did God allow Angels or Demons to have relationships with Human Females and produce offspring?

  1. The angels in heaven don’t engage in sexual relationships with human beings but the fallen angels were a different story.

  2. The ‘story’ is one thing, and the ‘interpretation of the story’ is sometimes something else. Scripture is not totally clear about what happened. Perhaps genetic engineering, or cloning…. and thus it would seem that we are very close to the end.

  3. Do a Google search for “free porn”. Your answer lies there. (as do many trojans – but that’s an entirely different issue, no?)

  4. The story isn’t true. It is pure myth, that was added for dramatic effect. There are no angels or demons. God is alone in the Universe. He created all things by himself. God said:

    “I am God, the Creator of all things. I alone stretched out the heavens; when I made the earth, no one helped me.” (Isaiah 44:24)

    Christians in particular believe that God has angels around him, some good some bad, but that wayward belief is rooted in Greek mythology. There are many foreign inserts in the bible. Read God’s commandments and laws and notice how he dealt with his people the Israelites and you will soon be able to separate the truth from the hocus pocus inserts.

  5. Demons are nothing but primitive mythological figures which was em,ployed to scare children with and none are real.

    Angels are stars and while we see angels fall now and then no woman was ever seduced by one.

  6. The sons of God in those particular verses were not angels, even though the sons of God in the Old Testament most of the time, referred to the angels. In these verses prior to the flood, the sons of God were from the line that the Savior would come through. The sons of Seth. Only one, Noah was pure to the line of Seth, who was saved, with his family, from the flood. Righteous enough to carry the chosen line.The daughters of the sons of man were the common men, and not of the line to David, which Jesus would descend from, and be called the son of David.

    Mat 22:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.
    Mat 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

    The angels are not sexual and are neither male nor female, on earth or in heaven. They were created nonsexual and they have not the power to change the way they were created.

  7. That is a stupid interpretation and it is YOUR interpretation.

    To put it mildly I think ST Thomas Aquinas would call you an asssss (but nicely )

    Reply Obj. 6. As Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xv): Many persons affirm that they have had the experience, or have heard from such as have experienced it, that the Satyrs and Fauns, whom the common folk call incubi, have often presented themselves before women, and have sought and procured intercourse with them. Hence it is folly to deny it. But God�s holy angels could not fall in such fashion before the deluge. Hence by the sons of God are to be understood the sons of Seth, who were good; while by the daughters of men the Scripture designates those who sprang from the race of Cain. Nor is it to be wondered at that giants should be born of them; for they were not all giants, albeit there were many more before than after the deluge. Still if some are occasionally begotten from demons, it is not from the seed of such demons, nor from their assumed bodies, but from the seed of men taken for the purpose; as when the demon assumes first the form of a woman, and afterwards of a man; just as they take the seed of other things for other generating purposes, as Augustine says (De Trin. iii), so that the person born is not the child of a demon, but of a man.

  8. Why do we have freedom of choice? Would it be better if we all were puppets on a string?

  9. The truth is when you are the author of a fairytale you can write the story any kind of way you want. That way the only person it has to make sense to is the author..

  10. it refers to men as sons of god and women as daughters of men.this is because man was breathed into by god,causing life,but womans life was brought from inside man.wich you could take literally,or concider that this may be talking about two groups of people or even asexual reproduction as well,not necessarily one man and one woman.i dont understand why certain people criticize others for their way of thinking,but think the same way when they read the bible.makes no sense to me.instead of trying to show how it doesnt make sense,why dont you see if you can make sense out of it in a different way if they are so obviously wrong.i think it is because half those who claim to be logical are defying logic by dismissing an idea that they admit cannot be disproven,and have no evidence for or against.not very scientific is it?

    “evidence of change is not evidence of chance”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *